capacity engine
- paso750
- paso grand pooh-bah
- Posts: 5558
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 12:00 am
- model: 750 Paso
- year: 1987
- Location: southern Germany
Re: capacity engine
Over the holidays I was thinking about this topic and how it seems you don't really have a plan which imho shows in some things you wrote.
If you're serious about this and unless you're just randomly checking your options I'd suggest you stop and take a step back. The only approach that makes sense is to know exactly what you need (not what you want) and have a concept. To get there you'll have to answer yourself more questions.
But before getting there, you say you aim for 85-90 then 90-100hp. If the base is a 750 engine you should know that the 72hp that are on paper are actually 60-64hp at the rear wheel which can be seen on different dyno charts. Getting +30hp out of a 750 engine is not realistic and even if you can get over 20hp out of it the result will be an engine which is for sure not for everyday use. Forget max hp, that's not what you're after. If you'll be riding the bike on the street you want torque. If you aim for torque a hp increase will come with it automatically.
This should answer the question if a 750 crankshaft can handle 90-100hp. You will not get in that situation.
If 96mm pistons fit on a 750 engine ? The original ones are 88mm, the 780cc big bore kit is 90mm, the 900cc engines have 92mm pistons. 94mm pistons on a 900cc engine result in 944cc, 96mm in 960cc.
Take a 750 cylinder base gasket, measure the outer diameter of a 900cc cylinder and you'll see that doesn't make sense.
A 900SS engine has a 43mm inlet and a 38mm outlet valve, so can you fit a 44mm valve in a 750 head - no.
You can combine a 750 racing valve and a 900SS valve but you'll need a washer for the spark plugs. Lift and overlap have to be considered such as the clearance to the piston, even more if the pistons have a high dome and the cams are aftermarket.
900SS cams are not worthwhile losing time with btw. You can also read BikeBoy`s tests.
Every modification to an engine, exhaust or carburetion system will influence its performance, narrow or widen hp & torque output range and shift it up or down the revv range. You need to be clear about what you want. Some modifications only work in combination with others and some shouldn't be combined. The more there is done the more the whole characteristics of the engine is impacted and chances are you'll end up with an engine that shows a great result on a dyno but doesn't meet your expectations on the street.
For instance "lightening all the sprockets / flywheel and max porting on the heads incl racing cams" + large valves etc imo doesn't really coincide with a street used 750 engine.
I never really understood the appeal so many guys show for "race" parts. "Race" means the parts are designed for max performance at WOT and a revv range you will hardly hit on the street. Other parts like race brakes can also be the opposite of an improvement because they ideally operate at temperatures which you will not reach under normal riding conditions.
Coming back to the beginning; some questions you should ask yourself are:
- how is your actual riding style and how would an engine need to be to match that ?
- what is your budget ? A full engine modification can easily cost as much as your bike is currently worth. While the crankshaft will do you'll need aftermarket conrods, in consequence a crankshaft rebalancing, new crankshaft bearings etc etc
- does it make sense to use a 750 engine as base or directly go for a 900 ?
- how "street legal" do you want to stay ? Most mods may not be legal anyway but things like large valves do increase noise emission in a noticeable way
- do you want a bullet proof engine or just max power output (if it's the first skip a dual spark plug conversion)
sorry, got a bit carried away ...
G.
If you're serious about this and unless you're just randomly checking your options I'd suggest you stop and take a step back. The only approach that makes sense is to know exactly what you need (not what you want) and have a concept. To get there you'll have to answer yourself more questions.
But before getting there, you say you aim for 85-90 then 90-100hp. If the base is a 750 engine you should know that the 72hp that are on paper are actually 60-64hp at the rear wheel which can be seen on different dyno charts. Getting +30hp out of a 750 engine is not realistic and even if you can get over 20hp out of it the result will be an engine which is for sure not for everyday use. Forget max hp, that's not what you're after. If you'll be riding the bike on the street you want torque. If you aim for torque a hp increase will come with it automatically.
This should answer the question if a 750 crankshaft can handle 90-100hp. You will not get in that situation.
If 96mm pistons fit on a 750 engine ? The original ones are 88mm, the 780cc big bore kit is 90mm, the 900cc engines have 92mm pistons. 94mm pistons on a 900cc engine result in 944cc, 96mm in 960cc.
Take a 750 cylinder base gasket, measure the outer diameter of a 900cc cylinder and you'll see that doesn't make sense.
A 900SS engine has a 43mm inlet and a 38mm outlet valve, so can you fit a 44mm valve in a 750 head - no.
You can combine a 750 racing valve and a 900SS valve but you'll need a washer for the spark plugs. Lift and overlap have to be considered such as the clearance to the piston, even more if the pistons have a high dome and the cams are aftermarket.
900SS cams are not worthwhile losing time with btw. You can also read BikeBoy`s tests.
Every modification to an engine, exhaust or carburetion system will influence its performance, narrow or widen hp & torque output range and shift it up or down the revv range. You need to be clear about what you want. Some modifications only work in combination with others and some shouldn't be combined. The more there is done the more the whole characteristics of the engine is impacted and chances are you'll end up with an engine that shows a great result on a dyno but doesn't meet your expectations on the street.
For instance "lightening all the sprockets / flywheel and max porting on the heads incl racing cams" + large valves etc imo doesn't really coincide with a street used 750 engine.
I never really understood the appeal so many guys show for "race" parts. "Race" means the parts are designed for max performance at WOT and a revv range you will hardly hit on the street. Other parts like race brakes can also be the opposite of an improvement because they ideally operate at temperatures which you will not reach under normal riding conditions.
Coming back to the beginning; some questions you should ask yourself are:
- how is your actual riding style and how would an engine need to be to match that ?
- what is your budget ? A full engine modification can easily cost as much as your bike is currently worth. While the crankshaft will do you'll need aftermarket conrods, in consequence a crankshaft rebalancing, new crankshaft bearings etc etc
- does it make sense to use a 750 engine as base or directly go for a 900 ?
- how "street legal" do you want to stay ? Most mods may not be legal anyway but things like large valves do increase noise emission in a noticeable way
- do you want a bullet proof engine or just max power output (if it's the first skip a dual spark plug conversion)
sorry, got a bit carried away ...
G.
- Bock900r
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 1:33 am
- model: 907 I.E.
- year: 1991
- Location: Hamburg/Germany Novi/Michigan
Re: capacity engine
95HP was possible in the last 750 TT1 race Engines.
Just take a tone off money and build a Race Engine with a weekend lifetime
Just take a tone off money and build a Race Engine with a weekend lifetime
Rüdiger
__________
84 GPZ 900R
84 GPZ 900R
86 GPZ 900R
88 GPZ 900R
888 SP4
907ie Black
907ie Red
907 evo (project)
998 Matrix
998s FE
V50 Monza
MV Agusta 750 Evo2
ZXR750RR-K
ZXR750RR-M
__________
84 GPZ 900R
84 GPZ 900R
86 GPZ 900R
88 GPZ 900R
888 SP4
907ie Black
907ie Red
907 evo (project)
998 Matrix
998s FE
V50 Monza
MV Agusta 750 Evo2
ZXR750RR-K
ZXR750RR-M
- jcslocum
- paso grand pooh-bah
- Posts: 1714
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 12:00 am
- model: 750 Paso
- year: 1988
- Location: Eastern Shore, MD
- Contact:
Re: capacity engine
Race engines measure hours not miles!
I have an 87-F1 with some slight performance mods and it's very perky. Quite fun to ride too. But 90hp from a Paso engine will be extremely expensive and no fun on the street. Just as an example of what can be done to an air cooled twin, I have built a monster motor for my Multi. 1098cc 12:1 compression, knifed crank, slight porting on the heads, custom dyno tuning and she makes 95hp and 94 ft. Lb torque. It's street bike and it's a wonder to ride. Torque is where it's at for the street.
I have an 87-F1 with some slight performance mods and it's very perky. Quite fun to ride too. But 90hp from a Paso engine will be extremely expensive and no fun on the street. Just as an example of what can be done to an air cooled twin, I have built a monster motor for my Multi. 1098cc 12:1 compression, knifed crank, slight porting on the heads, custom dyno tuning and she makes 95hp and 94 ft. Lb torque. It's street bike and it's a wonder to ride. Torque is where it's at for the street.
-
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 2:31 pm
- model: 907 I.E.
- year: 1993
- Location: winston salem, nc usa
Re: capacity engine
Hi G.,
That was a excellent recap of good old hot rod logic. I always thought for street use that a engine taken apart and "blueprinted" ie highly balanced, very good tolerances etc would be about as good as it gets for the everyday street.My experiences down that path has been with BMW's and I expect that a 750 would be the same.Regards Arch.
That was a excellent recap of good old hot rod logic. I always thought for street use that a engine taken apart and "blueprinted" ie highly balanced, very good tolerances etc would be about as good as it gets for the everyday street.My experiences down that path has been with BMW's and I expect that a 750 would be the same.Regards Arch.
- Brutus
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 12:00 am
- model: 750 Paso
- year: 1989
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: capacity engine
Thanks for the input. You're right. I've to get it sorted out. First my thoughts:
ad2) I'm doing most of the work myself. Don't have a real budget. All the money going in isn't the best investment anyway
ad3) 750!
ad4) we ain't got no TUV
ad5) in the middle would be fine.
This should give the following options:
Heads
Stock 750 paso heads as base, ported inlet and exhaust for an optimal flow between the 44 dcnf, combustion chamber and the exhaust.
I'll have to find out if the stock cams give enough lift though. Also I'll have to calculate what kind of diameter exhaust tubing I need.
Cylinders
Currently I drive a californian model, with the "flat" pistons. As I mentioned earlier I've got the stock paso pistons with the higher domes on the shelf. These could be used in combination with 1mm squish.
Second option will be aftermarket 90mm hc pistons. I could go for wiseco, pistal etc. Point of concern is the extra weight of hc pistons that'll make balancing of the crank needed.
rest of the engine
stock overhauled engine as base, heavy duty clutch springs if needed, longer secondair transmission shaft (more offset front 15t sprocket), slightly lightened flywheel just for kicks.
exhaust
See above. I'll have to calculate what is needed for an optimum flow. If the stock diameter is enough, I'm still considering making my own exhaust. "Spaghetti" look-a-like of some sort
To be continued
ad1) riding style is sporty, max 170 km/ph for short distances. Most of the time approx 130 km/ph on the freeway. This is the reason I'd like more torque between 5k - 7k.paso750 wrote: 1) how is your actual riding style and how would an engine need to be to match that ?
2) what is your budget ? A full engine modification can easily cost as much as your bike is currently worth. While the crankshaft will do you'll need aftermarket conrods, in consequence a crankshaft rebalancing, new crankshaft bearings etc etc
3) does it make sense to use a 750 engine as base or directly go for a 900 ?
4) how "street legal" do you want to stay ? Most mods may not be legal anyway but things like large valves do increase noise emission in a noticeable way
5) do you want a bullet proof engine or just max power output (if it's the first skip a dual spark plug conversion)
ad2) I'm doing most of the work myself. Don't have a real budget. All the money going in isn't the best investment anyway
ad3) 750!
ad4) we ain't got no TUV
ad5) in the middle would be fine.
I've owned different ducati's and I just asumed that around 90 bhp would do the trick. Didn't think through it has only approx 62 hp at the back wheel. Now I realize it's allmost impossible to get it tuned this far and keep the engine in one piece for road use. The reason for upgrading the engine is that it could use more torque between 5k -7k and furthermore it is a "technical challenge"..paso750 wrote:..But before getting there, you say you aim for 85-90 then 90-100hp. If the base is a 750 engine you should know that the 72hp that are on paper are actually 60-64hp at the rear wheel which can be seen on different dyno charts. Getting +30hp out of a 750 engine is not realistic and even if you can get over 20hp out of it the result will be an engine which is for sure not for everyday use. Forget max hp, that's not what you're after. If you'll be riding the bike on the street you want torque. If you aim for torque a hp increase will come with it automatically..
Got it. An std 750 crank it is.paso750 wrote:This should answer the question if a 750 crankshaft can handle 90-100hp. You will not get in that situation.
At the time I didn't know the limits of the casing. I realize now that the studs and the opening of the casing got it's limits..paso750 wrote:If 96mm pistons fit on a 750 engine ? The original ones are 88mm, the 780cc big bore kit is 90mm, the 900cc engines have 92mm pistons. 94mm pistons on a 900cc engine result in 944cc, 96mm in 960cc.
Take a 750 cylinder base gasket, measure the outer diameter of a 900cc cylinder and you'll see that doesn't make sense.
As far of the heads I've started reading "Performance tuning in theory and practise" by Graham Bell. Interesting stuff. He states that there is a certain balance between the amount of gas going in and getting it fully transformed into energy. If I understand correctly 41mm (1,6 inch) inlet and 35mm (1,37 inch) exhaust valves should be enough. Focus should be on the correct porting and valve lift.paso750 wrote:A 900SS engine has a 43mm inlet and a 38mm outlet valve, so can you fit a 44mm valve in a 750 head - no.
You can combine a 750 racing valve and a 900SS valve but you'll need a washer for the spark plugs. Lift and overlap have to be considered such as the clearance to the piston, even more if the pistons have a high dome and the cams are aftermarket.
900SS cams are not worthwhile losing time with btw. You can also read BikeBoy`s tests.
This should give the following options:
Heads
Stock 750 paso heads as base, ported inlet and exhaust for an optimal flow between the 44 dcnf, combustion chamber and the exhaust.
I'll have to find out if the stock cams give enough lift though. Also I'll have to calculate what kind of diameter exhaust tubing I need.
Cylinders
Currently I drive a californian model, with the "flat" pistons. As I mentioned earlier I've got the stock paso pistons with the higher domes on the shelf. These could be used in combination with 1mm squish.
Second option will be aftermarket 90mm hc pistons. I could go for wiseco, pistal etc. Point of concern is the extra weight of hc pistons that'll make balancing of the crank needed.
rest of the engine
stock overhauled engine as base, heavy duty clutch springs if needed, longer secondair transmission shaft (more offset front 15t sprocket), slightly lightened flywheel just for kicks.
exhaust
See above. I'll have to calculate what is needed for an optimum flow. If the stock diameter is enough, I'm still considering making my own exhaust. "Spaghetti" look-a-like of some sort
To be continued
Last edited by Brutus on Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:27 am, edited 3 times in total.
_________________
Better too late than too ugly..
Better too late than too ugly..
- ducapaso
- paso grand pooh-bah
- Posts: 1097
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 12:00 am
- model: 750 Paso
- year: 1988
- Location: siena, italy
- Contact:
Re: capacity engine
ok, it will take some time! Have a nice job!
have a nice ride, Nicola
Black "DUKE" 751582
ex...Red "smooth" 753349
Black "DUKE" 751582
ex...Red "smooth" 753349
- Brutus
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 12:00 am
- model: 750 Paso
- year: 1989
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: capacity engine
Tx. I'll have a go at a spare engine. It's one of the latest 750 models. Looks like crap, but a solid base to start from. In the meantime I can ride the paso with the current engine.ducapaso wrote:ok, it will take some time! Have a nice job!
Léon
- Attachments
-
- rhucuuB0vPnUNyyrd3CTlA==.jpg (75.93 KiB) Viewed 6706 times
_________________
Better too late than too ugly..
Better too late than too ugly..
- paso750
- paso grand pooh-bah
- Posts: 5558
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 12:00 am
- model: 750 Paso
- year: 1987
- Location: southern Germany
Re: capacity engine
That is what I was thinkingBrutus wrote: ad1) riding style is sporty, max 170 km/ph for short distances. Most of the time approx 130 km/ph on the freeway. This is the reason I'd like more torque between 5k - 7k.
In case you`re interested in a set of polished and rebalanced 750 conrods let me knowad2) I'm doing most of the work myself. Don't have a real budget. All the money going in isn't the best investment anyway
I know but Police will stop you for excessive noise. (specially if you come to Germany)ad4) we ain't got no TUV
that`s an arguement I can understandand furthermore it is a "technical challenge"..
Larger tubing will reduce back pressure and shift the torque to a higher rpm range.Also I'll have to calculate what kind of diameter exhaust tubing I need.
A friend of mine has a custom header with a Quad D exhaust on a ST2 engine. The bike really pulls hard but only over 6.000rpm. Below that I find it a little boring, an original bike has more low end punch. That wouldn`t be for me but it`s ok for his riding style.
Many aftermarket pistons are actually lighter than the original.Point of concern is the extra weight of hc pistons that'll make balancing of the crank needed.
-
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:38 am
- model: 750 Paso
- year: 1986
- Location: Mildura ,Australia
Re: capacity engine
Stick to what the experts say.Faloon and others such as ed milich have spent a lot of time building these engines for street / race , and are receptive to sensible emails. merry xmas and happy new year to all you duc enthusiasts. rgds J
PS No disrespect intended to any of the above posts,but there are so many variables involved in tuning a performance engine that unless you have considerable experience ,it can quickly become a nightmare
PS No disrespect intended to any of the above posts,but there are so many variables involved in tuning a performance engine that unless you have considerable experience ,it can quickly become a nightmare
- higgy
- paso grand pooh-bah
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:50 pm
- model: 907 I.E.
- year: 1992
- Location: Hilltown,Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: capacity engine
Thats a 30 year old book,a lot, no make that everything has changed since then
Ed I would listen too, when he knows you well enough to speak to you
Ed I would listen too, when he knows you well enough to speak to you
Ducati,making mechanics out of riders since 1946
There's no problem so bad that a little fixing can't make it worse! : )
If it ain't broke keep fixin it till it is
88 750
90 906
92 907ie
There's no problem so bad that a little fixing can't make it worse! : )
If it ain't broke keep fixin it till it is
88 750
90 906
92 907ie
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 11:14 pm
- model: other
- year: 1999
- Location: Melbourne Australia
Re: capacity engine
Looking forward to watching this project progress. It's great that you can bounce your ideas and thoughts around in a forum like this.
I would agree that you should study the work of engine builders and tuners mentioned in this thread. Check their websites and examine the motor recipes they have used to see what modifications will achieve your goals.
Good luck!
I would agree that you should study the work of engine builders and tuners mentioned in this thread. Check their websites and examine the motor recipes they have used to see what modifications will achieve your goals.
Good luck!
2013 M1100 Evo Street
2004 GSXR750 Track
2004 GSXR750 Track
- paso750
- paso grand pooh-bah
- Posts: 5558
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 12:00 am
- model: 750 Paso
- year: 1987
- Location: southern Germany
Re: capacity engine
- Attachments
-
- 1511419.jpg (67.79 KiB) Viewed 6627 times
- Brutus
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 12:00 am
- model: 750 Paso
- year: 1989
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: capacity engine
Thanks allot. I'll have to check the crank that is in my spare engine.Paso750 wrote:..In case you`re interested in a set of polished and rebalanced 750 conrods let me know..
Ok, I'll look into that.Paso750 wrote:Larger tubing will reduce back pressure and shift the torque to a higher rpm range.
A friend of mine has a custom header with a Quad D exhaust on a ST2 engine. The bike really pulls hard but only over 6.000rpm. Below that I find it a little boring, an original bike has more low end punch. That wouldn`t be for me but it`s ok for his riding style
Any idea what is a good option for hc pistons?Paso750 wrote:Many aftermarket pistons are actually lighter than the original.
Ok, good suggestion. I'll give it a try.Jayh wrote:Stick to what the experts say.Faloon and others such as ed milich have spent a lot of time building these engines for street / race , and are receptive to sensible emails. merry xmas and happy new year to all you duc enthusiasts. rgds J
Thanks, will do!koko64 wrote:Looking forward to watching this project progress. It's great that you can bounce your ideas and thoughts around in a forum like this.
I would agree that you should study the work of engine builders and tuners mentioned in this thread. Check their websites and examine the motor recipes they have used to see what modifications will achieve your goals.
A rebuild Indiana..? (750 offcourse)750paso wrote:
_________________
Better too late than too ugly..
Better too late than too ugly..
-
- paso grand pooh-bah
- Posts: 1878
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:35 am
- model: 906 Paso
- year: 1990
- Location: Newzealand
Re: capacity engine
http://forums.ducatipaso.org/download/file.php?id=678
Holy crap G ! you sure don't look like what I expected er, nice bike
Holy crap G ! you sure don't look like what I expected er, nice bike
I wish I was young again............Id be heaps smarter than last time