I know that was really bad taste & apologise to all

get to know this guy well enough for him to make the offer to you, it is definately worth it

$5500USD sounds high, regardless of condition. I'm sure it's worth that to the owner - in which case it comes down to how bad does he want to sell it, unfortunately. Like I said, I paid $3800 for a blue '88 (of which there are only 55 in the states) that was spotless w/ 4k on it. And even then, other Pasos were going on ebay for half that.mr_nibble wrote:this thursday or friday i will try to get the VIN # for the 750 paso. how many miles can one get on one of these bikes before it would need to be rebuilt? and does $5500 us dollars seem like a fair price for a spotless 750 paso with 8000 miles on it? i plan on rideing the bike on the interstate about 80 miles a day. if and when i get it one of the first thing i plan on doing to it is the electrical upgrades with the relays. and if the carbs are all that bad i would change them out second.
$5500 seems to be about $2k too much. I bought my 87 for $3K and it had only 4K miles on it.mr_nibble wrote:this thursday or friday i will try to get the VIN # for the 750 paso. how many miles can one get on one of these bikes before it would need to be rebuilt? and does $5500 us dollars seem like a fair price for a spotless 750 paso with 8000 miles on it? i plan on rideing the bike on the interstate about 80 miles a day. if and when i get it one of the first thing i plan on doing to it is the electrical upgrades with the relays. and if the carbs are all that bad i would change them out second.
Good points, especially re: tires. Michelin is stilll cranking out the A59s, right? That's what I'm running; I think there are only one or two - three tops - of matched front & rear pairings available, the Michelins being one. But my Paso's saddle is MUCH more comfortable than my Monster's for extended superslab rides. Actually, the Paso's saddle is much more comfortable in general.jcslocum wrote:As for riding it every day...well, it is a 17 year old bike. Think of it as a classic car. It will need more maintenance than a newer bike and the parts will be harder to come by. It is also 17 year old technology. A LOT has changed in 17 years, from tires to brakes. Tires will be a bitch to get BTW and if you do buy, it's always handy to have a set in stock.
I don't want to dissuade you from owning a Duc and the Paso is a beauty. But in my opinion, the Paso isn't a good choice for everyday commuting. An ST2, Monster or VFR is much more apprpriate.
the A/M59 is the ONLY tire that is OEM size for our bikes.fasterdammit wrote:Good points, especially re: tires. Michelin is stilll cranking out the A59s, right? That's what I'm running; I think there are only one or two - three tops - of matched front & rear pairings available, the Michelins being one. But my Paso's saddle is MUCH more comfortable than my Monster's for extended superslab rides. Actually, the Paso's saddle is much more comfortable in general.jcslocum wrote:As for riding it every day...well, it is a 17 year old bike. Think of it as a classic car. It will need more maintenance than a newer bike and the parts will be harder to come by. It is also 17 year old technology. A LOT has changed in 17 years, from tires to brakes. Tires will be a bitch to get BTW and if you do buy, it's always handy to have a set in stock.
I don't want to dissuade you from owning a Duc and the Paso is a beauty. But in my opinion, the Paso isn't a good choice for everyday commuting. An ST2, Monster or VFR is much more apprpriate.
And to follow up on the '17yo bike' comment - don't count it out as incapable, but don't expect it to run with the big dogs of recent years either. Otherwise, mine keeps up just fine, and I don't treat her like an old lady ...
I ride mine as well nearly as much as I do my 748. The handling with the 16" tire is really slow by comparison (not a fair comparo but I have ridden every ducati model and it's slooow) and not all that stable either. The brakes also lack modern power. I'm not disrespecting the Paso, it has many endearing qualities. It was leading edge in 87 and now it's trailing edge technology.fasterdammit wrote:And to follow up on the '17yo bike' comment - don't count it out as incapable, but don't expect it to run with the big dogs of recent years either. Otherwise, mine keeps up just fine, and I don't treat her like an old lady ...